Vol. 51 No. 1 (2026), Articles
Legal protection for NFT digital collectibles
Articles
Published
31.03.2026
Keywords
NFT digital collectibles
data rights
virtual property
intellectual property
legal protection
data rights
virtual property
intellectual property
legal protection
Abstract
The rapid development of blockchain technology has led to the emergence of NFT-based (non-fungible token) digital collectibles, which are becoming a new direction within the digital economy and the cultural industry. NFT technology enables the uniqueness of digital assets, verification of ownership, and transparency of transactions. However, this phenomenon also generates a number of complex legal issues. In particular, the uncertain legal status of NFT assets, risks of intellectual property infringement, and the lack of clearly defined mechanisms for platform liability and user rights protection pose significant challenges to existing legal systems. Therefore, a comprehensive academic analysis of the legal protection of NFT digital collectibles is of particular relevance. The purpose of the study is to determine the legal nature of NFT digital collectibles, analyze the main theoretical approaches to their legal status, and substantiate regulatory mechanisms aimed at reducing legal risks in the NFT market. The study applies the method of literature analysis. Relevant domestic and international academic publications on NFT technology, digital asset law, and intellectual property were examined, alongside an analysis of current legislation and judicial practice. In addition, practical legal disputes and real cases related to the functioning of the NFT market were reviewed. The research identifies two main legal characteristics of NFT digital collectibles. First, NFT certificates recorded on blockchain platforms possess the legal status of data-based property rights. Second, the underlying digital content associated with NFTs should be considered a form of virtual property. Furthermore, the study substantiates the need to classify NFT trading platforms, depending on their business models, as either technical service providers or content service providers. It also demonstrates the necessity of proportionally allocating legal responsibilities to platforms based on their control capabilities and the extent of economic benefits they derive. The proposed approaches contribute to improving the legal regulatory framework for NFT digital collectibles, strengthening intellectual property protection, and clarifying legal relations between platforms and users. The findings may serve as a theoretical foundation for developing effective governance mechanisms for the digital asset market and ensuring its sustainable and secure development.
References
1. Chen, J., & Friedmann, D. (2023). Jumping from mother monkey to bored ape: The value of NFTs from an artist’s and intellectual property perspective. Asia Pacific Law Review, (1), 100–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2117485
2. Feng, Y. (2023). Copyright dilemmas and responses in NFT trading in the metaverse era. Hubei Social Sciences, (6), 128–136. (in Chinese).
3. Guo, W., & Fan, Y. (2023). The legal nature and endogenous risks of cryptocurrency collectibles under blockchain smart contracts. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Sciences Edition), (2), 20–35. (in Chinese).
4. Hu, Y., & Peng, B. (2022). On the legal attributes of NFT digital collectibles: A review of the first copyright dispute case. Editor’s Friend, (9), 104–111. (in Chinese).
5. Jia, W., & Yao, B. (2024). NFTs applied to the art sector: Legal issues and recent jurisprudence. Convergence, 32(2), 807–822. (in Chinese). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231199966
6. Lee, E. (2023). NFTs as decentralized intellectual property. University of Illinois Law Review, 1049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4023736
7. Ma, Z., & Wang, X. (2023). Constructing NFT mapping rights in the metaverse. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 1–27. (in Chinese).
8. Meng, C., & Yang, J. (2022). NFT copyright trading: Legal risks and breakthrough strategies. Editor’s Friend, (8), 96–104. (in Chinese).
9. Peng, G. (2023). Legal characterization of NFT digital collectibles under the principle of functional equivalence: A new approach to incorporating virtual property into property law. Modern Law, (6), 118–132. (in Chinese).
10. Qin, R., Li, J., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Yong, Y., & Wang, F. (2021). NFT: Non-fungible tokens based on blockchain and their applications. Journal of Intelligent Science and Technology, 3(2), 234–242. (in Chinese).
11. Ren, S. (2023). On the property rights of NFT digital assets: A perspective of rights bundles. Zhejiang Social Sciences, (3), 5–68. (in Chinese).
12. Shao, Y. (2024). The legal implications of NFT trading and its regulatory pathways. Journal of Jinan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (8), 50–64. (in Chinese).
13. Wang, J. (2022). Copyright protection and platform liability in NFT trading models. Journal of Financial Law, (5), 70–80. (in Chinese).
14. Wang, R., Lee, J. A., & Liu, J. (2024). Unwinding NFTs in the shadow of IP law. American Business Law Journal, (1), 31–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12237
15. Yang, J. (2022). The nature, rules, and legal risk management of NFT trading in digital works. Science & Publishing, (10), 103–113. (in Chinese).
16. Yong, Y., & Wang, F. (2016). Current status and prospects of blockchain technology development. Journal of Automation, 42(4), 481–494. (in Chinese).
